Basic security measures. Secure encryption, message digest, and digital signature algorithms are used through out where applicable. All Users and System Entities are authenticated to appropriate degree. For the latter this means PKI authentication, but for the former anything from passwords to hardware tokens is possible. The details of these algorithms are not repeated here, but are covered in Annex A "Protocols" and Annex C "Compliance".
The TAS3 Architecture is a reusable overarching design that can be instantiated any number of times. It specifies a Trust Network (TN) and the manner in which the players, including Users and Service Providers, interact in the Trust Network. The TN may be composed of several organizations, mainly Service Providers (SPs), each of which may constitute a subnetwork and may participate in several other Trust Networks. The architecture addresses interaction of the subnetworks with each other and the top level Trust Networks. We also foresee multiple Trust Networks coexisting and interacting to various degrees. An organization can simultaneously belong to multiple TNs as long as it can simultaneously satisfy the requirements of each network.

Fig-1: Using TAS3 top level model to start modelling of organizations that participate in Trust Network.
Each Trust Network works in the legal context defined by its Governance Agreement. This architecture specifies some functions that are strictly necessary for protocol flows to work, and other functions that are necessary to satisfy nonfunctional properties like "secure" and "trustworthy". To impose on the players that the latter functions are implemented as well, we rely on legal obligation that stems from the Governance Agreement, as well as certification and audit programs, operated by the Trust Guarantor, to check that the legal obligations are met initially and on continued basis.
TAS3 Trust Network Domain. Consider Fig-1 where a Trust Network (TN), has chosen to adopt the overall TAS3 approach (which this and other documents specify). This means that at the "Summit" there is a Trust Guarantor (TG) who imposes on the TN the rules and model of operation. TG usually employs a Security Officer to maintain and enforce the model. The individual organizations may also have Security Officers responsible for their internal modelling and auditing.
Model. The Trust Network Domain configuration will be expressed using business process models, ontologies, and other models. The models are refined by each organization in their Modelling and Configuration Management. There will be several ontologies: architectural roles (e.g. Service Requester, Services Provider, Identity Provider), security ontology, privacy and data protection ontology and trust ontology. Payload services may define application specific ontologies, but they are not in scope of the TAS3 architecture. Ontologies in TAS3 are further discussed in [TAS3D22UPONTO]. Some mandatory policies emanating from EU will be modelled by the TAS3 project and incorporated to every TAS3 Compliant Trust Network Model (Req. D1.2-6.15-MinPolicy).
Audit and Oversight. The Trust Guarantor in its oversight role will operate compliance validation and audit functions. Each organization is expect to operate similar functions locally as Audit & Monitor. The audit trail stays principally within the organization, with Trust Guarantor only seeing pointers. There are some networkwide reporting and auditing requirements that guarantee that other parties in the network, and especially users, have enough transparency to operation of each party. This helps to transparently understand that what has happened is legitimate, prevent fraud, and increase overall trust in the network - a key business goal of TAS3.
Runtime and Enforcement conserns delivering the useful payload services, with appropriate mechanisms to authenticate and identify Users and Systems, as well as authorize the operations. Most of technical realization of TAS3 happens in this area.
Cross Domain and Cross Context. TAS3 Architecture expressly enables operation of services across domains. This can mean several organizations in one Trust Network, or it could even mean interworking of several Trust Networks.